Open Source as a Business

Open Source as a Business Strategy, Struggle & Success Philipp Krenn @xeraa @xeraa

[…] allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared. https://opensource.org/licenses @xeraa

Four Freedoms: Use, Study, Share, Improve https://fsfe.org/freesoftware/basics/ 4freedoms.en.html @xeraa

Who is using OSS? @xeraa

Who is opening issues? @xeraa

Who is contributing back? @xeraa

https://twitter.com/ geowolf/status/ 971811346823221248

Ninety-eight-point-five percent of the code ever put into the core of Puppet was put in there by somebody I paid. Luke Kaines (founder of Puppet), https://www.geekwire.com/2018/might-time-bigcloud-share-wealth-open-source-startups/ @xeraa

Open Source ≠ Business Model @xeraa

Open source is a distribution model that allows us to build community. It’s a force multiplier. Shay Banon, Elastic @xeraa

@xeraa

Developer @xeraa

@xeraa

!”# Where is the ? @xeraa

Agenda Strategy Struggle Success @xeraa

Strategy @xeraa

Services Support, Consulting, Training, Certification @xeraa

@xeraa

https://investors.redhat.com/~/media/Files/R/Red-Hat-IR/documents/q418-fact-sheet.pdf

Support Problem Ease of Use @xeraa

Support Problem Renewal Rates @xeraa

Consulting & Training Problem Service-Only Competition @xeraa

Red Hat has a unique business model crafted in the late 90’s/early 00’s when open source lived in a much stronger ideological environment. Sacha Labourey (Hudson / Jenkins / CloudBees), https://medium.com/ @sachalabourey/ibm-acquires-red-hat-where-is-google-b2fe186ccfe4 @xeraa

https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/15/suse-is-once-again-an-independent-company/ @xeraa

Open Core @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Competing Tools @xeraa

Problem Less Open, More Commercial @xeraa

Problem Cloud Providers @xeraa

Cloud Service @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Cloud Providers @xeraa

With the advent of the public cloud, pure open source models are very hard to defend. Sacha Labourey (Hudson / Jenkins / CloudBees), https://medium.com/ @sachalabourey/ibm-acquires-red-hat-where-is-google-b2fe186ccfe4 @xeraa

Cost in the Cloud @xeraa

The intent of open source software was not so that someone else can take the exact same software and offer it as a service. Salil Deshpande (Bain Capital), https://www.geekwire.com/2018/might-time-bigcloud-share-wealth-open-source-startups/ @xeraa

Partnerships @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Domain Specific @xeraa

Donations @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Scaling & Planning @xeraa

For Patreon/donations to be a viable business model, have to put in just as much work as you’d have to do selling services/product, likely ending up w less from donations You can point to donation models that had it easy & I can point to traditional businesses that got lucky too Stephanie Hurlburt (Entrepreneur, Founder), https://twitter.com/sehurlburt/ status/1036091578060656640 @xeraa

Certified Partners @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Requires Commercial Ecosystem @xeraa

Ads @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem What Is (the Price to Be) Acceptable @xeraa

Merchandise @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Revenue @xeraa

Bounty / Crowdfunding @xeraa

@xeraa

Problem Vision & Maintainablility @xeraa

Corporate Sponsoring @xeraa

Problem Incentives @xeraa

Struggle @xeraa

Philosophy @xeraa

If you are claiming your startup/company is open source and you aren’t contributing to some form of upstream… then you aren’t really. Sorry not sorry. Jessie Frazelle (Keyser Söze of containers), https://twitter.com/jessfraz/ status/954802380125736961 @xeraa

Contributors Users Consumers @xeraa

[…] Amazon, on one hand, bashes the open source ecosystem and highlights the advantage of its own tools, while at the same time taking projects like Presto, which was developed in the open by Facebook, and turning it into a packaged, revenue-generating product (the newly announced Athena service). https://dzone.com/articles/did-amazon-just-kill-open-source @xeraa

[…] If you are MSFT and I ask you if you’ve used Redis and you say “you mean Azure Redis Cache?”, that’s not a good sign. https://twitter.com/jensenharris/status/984268950136537088 @xeraa

@xeraa

RedisLabs Modules: AGPL RediSearch, Redis Graph, ReJSON, ReBloom, Redis-ML @xeraa

Apache 2 modified with Commons Clause (2018/08) @xeraa

Without limiting other conditions in the License, the grant of rights under the License will not include, and the License does not grant to you, the right to Sell the Software. https://commonsclause.com @xeraa

Confusion CC Apache 2 modified with Commons Clause https://commons.apache.org @xeraa

Some rabid open-source wonks accused Redis Labs of trying to trick the community into thinking that modules were open source, because they used the word “Apache.” https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/07/commons-clause-stops-open-source-abuse/ @xeraa

Be aware that the debate starting up about the Common Clause license due to Redis Labs adopting it will likely be heavily tainted by large corporations who have a lot of free labor to lose suddenly pretending to be huge champions of free software ideals. https://twitter.com/taotetek/status/1032248562116186112 @xeraa

Redis: BSD “Redis will remain BSD licensed” http://antirez.com/news/120 “Redis is not “open core” http://antirez.com/news/121 @xeraa

RedisLabs Modules: Redis Source Available License (2019/03) @xeraa

https://redislabs.com/community/licenses/

@xeraa

AGPL Server / Apache Clients Server Side Public License (2018/10) @xeraa

“13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.” “13. Offering the Program as a Service.” https://www.mongodb.com/licensing/server-side-public-license @xeraa

More than Reciprocal Permissive vs Copyleft vs SSPL @xeraa

https://www.percona.com/blog/2018/10/24/poll-mongodb-license-change/ @xeraa

Timing Effective Today @xeraa

Clones Amazon DocumentDB @xeraa

[…] we are hereby withdrawing the SSPL from OSI consideration. http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2019March/003989.html @xeraa

@xeraa

For purposes of this Agreement, “Excluded Purpose” means making available any softwareas-a-service, platform-as-a-service, infrastructure-as-a-service or other similar online service that competes with Confluent products or services that provide the Software. https://www.confluent.io/confluent-community-license @xeraa

https://www.confluent.io/blog/license-changes-confluent-platform

Money @xeraa

Conflict of Interest Open Source vs Commercial View @xeraa

@xeraa

In case you needed proof, @zdatainc just released a #benchmark report where #DataStax6 outperforms #OpenSource #cassandra http:// bit.ly/2txOvWl #databases #data https://twitter.com/DataStax/status/1012380187886055424 @xeraa

@xeraa

Venture Capital Accelerated Development vs Calling the Shots @xeraa

@xeraa

Development Hobbled Product vs Starving Company @xeraa

@xeraa

Tricks Open Source but… @xeraa

@xeraa

Success @xeraa

Business Is Optional @xeraa

@xeraa

Business Is Complicated @xeraa

It saddens me that closed source companies are acclaimed for merely putting a piece of code on GitHub, while commercial open source companies get the worse shit for any action that involves protecting their work. Arnaud Porterie (former Docker engine lead), https://twitter.com/icecrime/status/1032155227368185856 @xeraa

Time for an Updated Model? @xeraa

MongoDB seeks to do what the FSF failed to do in 2007: close the “ASP loophole.” That is, to make the GPL (and open source) more relevant to the cloud era by ensuring those that modify and distribute open source as a cloud service contribute back. Matt Asay (former MongoDB VP of Community), https://twitter.com/mjasay/status/1052191818937327616 @xeraa

@xeraa

Today, we’re adopting an extremely permissive version of the Business Source License (BSL). CockroachDB users can scale CockroachDB to any number of nodes. They can use CockroachDB or embed it in their applications (whether they ship those applications to customers or run them as a service). They can even run it as a service internally. The one and only thing that you cannot do is offer a commercial version of CockroachDB as a service without buying a license. https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/oss-relicensing-cockroachdb/ @xeraa

What to Protect @xeraa

@xeraa

We release open source code under the Apache 2.0 license, which permits third parties to copy and redistribute the underlying software under the terms of the license. However, the Apache 2.0 license does not provide any license or right to use any of the Chef Marks. You may redistribute the applicable Chef open source software under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license, but you may not use the Chef Marks in doing so without express written permission from Chef or as expressly permitted in this Policy. https://www.chef.io/trademark-policy/ @xeraa

The “Elasticsearch” word mark may be used in referring to Elasticsearch, such as “for Elasticsearch” or “compatible with Elasticsearch,” etc. The reference must be correct, namely, the product must actually fully function with Elasticsearch. https://www.elastic.co/legal/trademarks/ @xeraa

Elastic’s Strategy @xeraa

All Code Open Not Open Source — Apache 2 & Elastic License @xeraa

@xeraa

Training Consulting @xeraa

@xeraa

https://elastic.shop

Questions? Disagreement? Philipp Krenn @xeraa @xeraa